Investigation was in fact analysed having fun with SPSS twenty-five.0. First detailed analyses was in fact did, as well as Cronbach’s alphas and you may frequencies. Binary logistic regressions were utilized to evaluate relationships between gender, years, intimate orientation, with a romantic/sexual partner, SNS put, sexting normalisation and you will willingness to engage in sexting due to the fact separate variables, in addition to four sexting behaviors once the built variables. Nagelkerke’s Roentgen dos try thought to be a measure of perception size. All details was indeed joined into the model additionally. The analysis has also been stratified of the intercourse.
Prevalence away from sexting behaviors
The most common sexting behaviors are becoming (21.2%) and receiving through an intermediary (twenty eight.4%), with 3rd-group forwarding regarding sexual posts (nine.3%) https://kissbrides.com/es/zoosk-opinion/ and, lastly, delivering (8.1%). Descriptive analytics get during the Dining table 2.
This new regression habits have been high. Nagelkerke’s Roentgen dos is .42 on “sending” design, .30 towards the “receiving” design, .23 toward “third-group forwarding” design, and .17 toward “searching thru a mediator” design (Dining table step 3:
About “sending” model, willingness to help you sext (OR: 8.26; 95% rely on interval [CI]: 5.36-), having an enchanting/intimate partner (OR: 3.44; 95% CI: 2.25-5.25), playing with Snapchat (OR: 1.87; 95% CI: 1.19-2.93), sexual orientation (OR: step 1.77; 95% CI: step 1.04-3.00) and you can age (OR: step 1.36; 95% CI: step 1.step one4-step one.63) have been notably linked to delivering wedding. About “receiving” model, with a romantic/sexual lover (OR: step three.27; 95% CI: 2.51-cuatro.28), determination in order to sext (OR: 2.79; 95% CI: dos.01-3.89), playing with Instagram (OR: 1.89; 95% CI: step one.16-step three.10), sex (OR: step one.82; 95% CI: 1.37-dos.41), using Snapchat (OR: step 1.6step 1; 95% CI: step one.dos1-2.14), sexting normalisation (OR: step one.49; 95% CI: step 1.20-step one.86) and you may many years (OR: 1.26; 95% CI: step one.step 12-1.41) had been notably connected with receiving engagement.
Regarding the “third-team forwarding” model, playing with Instagram (OR: 2.74; 95% CI: step one.16-six.51), willingness so you’re able to sext (OR: dos.00; 95% CI: step 1.48-dos.72), sex (OR: 1.96; 95% CI: 1.3dos-dos.91), which have an enchanting/intimate partner (OR: step one.86; 95% CI: 1.29-dos.68), having fun with Twitter (OR: 1.53; 95% CI: step 1.03-dos.26), sexting normalisation (OR: 1.43; 95% CI: 1.09-step one.87) and decades (OR: step 1.43; 95% CI: 1.22-step one.66) was basically rather pertaining to engagement during the third-group forwarding.
Regarding “acquiring through an intermediary” design, playing with Instagram (OR: dos.16; 95% CI: step one.47-step three.19), sexting normalisation (OR: 1.84; 95% CI: step 1.52-dos.24), that have an intimate/intimate lover (OR: 1.7step one; 95% CI: step 1.35-2.17), sex (OR: step one.4step one; 95% CI: step one.11-step one.80) and age (OR: step 1.36; 95% CI: step 1.23-step one.49) was in fact significantly linked to wedding in researching through a mediator.
Sex variations
The regression activities had been high. Nagelkerke’s Roentgen 2 is .fifty for females and you will .41 having boys on the “sending” model; .30 for women and you can .29 to possess people towards “receiving” model; .18 for females and you may .twenty-four for people on the “third-group forwarding” model; and .14 for girls and .twenty-two to possess boys towards “receiving through a mediator” model (Desk 4:
Regarding “sending” design, for girls, determination in order to sext (OR: ; 95% CI: -), with an intimate/sexual mate (OR: cuatro.54; 95% CI: dos.27-9.09) and age (OR: step 1.60; 95% CI: 1.17-2.20) have been rather connected with sending engagement. To possess guys, these were readiness to help you sext (OR: six.05; 95% CI: step 3.68-9.94), having a romantic/intimate mate (OR: 2.79; 95% CI: step 1.59-4.88) and ultizing Snapchat (OR: 2.38; 95% CI: step one.32-4.29).
About “receiving” model, for females, readiness so you can sext (OR: 5.11; 95% CI: 2.57-), using Instagram (OR: cuatro.34; 95% CI: step one.43-), having a romantic/intimate partner (OR: 3.77; 95% CI: dos.49-5.72), sexting normalisation (OR: step 1.62; 95% CI: step one.13-2.33) and you can many years (OR: 1.42; 95% CI: 1.step 17-1.72) was indeed rather related to finding engagement. To have males, these people were with an enchanting/sexual mate (OR: 2.97; 95% CI: 2.08-cuatro.25), willingness in order to sext (OR: dos.32; 95% CI: step one.58-step three.41), using Snapchat (OR: dos.03; 95% CI: 1.38-2.91), sexting normalisation (OR: step one.40; 95% CI: 1.06-step one.86) and ages (OR: step one.20; 95% CI: 1.04-step 1.38).
