The results are expressed as means and standard deviations, unless stated otherwise. Between-group differences in subject characteristics were tested using one-way ANOVA followed by pairwise comparisons using Tukey’s multiple comparison procedure if a significant F test was obtained. Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was used to adjust body composition results for comparison across ethnic groups. Before carrying out the ANCOVA, similarity of regression slopes among the ethnic groups was verified by examining the significance of the interaction between the covariate(s) and the group variable. Relationships between body composition measurements and age were investigated by multiple regression analysis controlling for independent variables such as height and weight. Potential interaction terms and non-linear relationships were examined for selected variables. Pearson’s correlation coefficients are presented for bivariate linear relationships with age and partial correlation coefficients where adjustment is made for weight and height. Data were analysed using SPSS version 13.0 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Results with P < 0·05>
Class and you can whole-human anatomy composition
Looks structure attributes of the victims are summarised of the sex and you can ethnicity when you look at the Dining table 2. Western european guys was basically more youthful, large along with straight down FM and you will percentage of BF than the alternatives on most other three teams. European female have been more youthful than just Western Indian feminine, and you will was indeed large along with all the way down FM and you will portion of BF than its equivalents on other three groups. The brand new Far eastern Indian dudes got leg pounds and you will BMC but large percentage of BF than the European, Maori and you can Pacific men. The new Asian Indian women in addition to encountered the large part of BF together with low BMC of four cultural teams, whenever you are themselves weight is below Maori and Pacific feminine and not significantly distinctive from the newest Western european feminine. Immediately after variations for years, level and you will pounds, Western Indians met with the large FM, reasonable fat-totally free mass and low BMC of your four cultural groups, while Pacific encountered the low FM and you can highest fat-totally free size, for both group, in addition to large BMC for men (Table step three).
Matchmaking ranging from Bmi and you can part of body fat
Curvilinear relationships between the percentage of BF and BMI for each ethnic group were linearised by logarithmically transforming BMI (Fig. 1)parison of regression equations of the percentage of BF on the logarithm of BMI with age as a covariate and with sex and ethnicity as group variables indicated significant heterogeneity in the slopes of the male and slawische Versand Bestellung Braut Seite female equations (P < 0·0001).>
Fig. 1 Relationship between the percentage of body fat (BF) and BMI of European (?), Maori (0), Pacific Island (^) and Asian Indian (?) (a) men and (b) women. The linear regressions are: percentage of BF = 117·7 log10(BMI) ? 144·2 (standard error of estimate (SEE) = 5·2 %, r 2 0·61, n 124) for European men (-); percentage of BF = 101·3 log10(BMI) ? 122·0 (SEE = 4·6 %, r 2 0·74, n 109) for Maori men (- – -); percentage of BF = 93·6 log10(BMI) ? 113·6 (SEE = 4·1 %, r 2 0·68, n 104) for Pacific Island men (·····); percentage of BF = 78·6 log10(BMI) ? 79·4 (SEE = 5·0 %, r 2 0·52, n 117) for Asian Indian men (-·-·); percentage of BF = 103·5 log10(BMI) ? 109·7 (SEE = 4·8 %, r 2 0·72, n 186) for European women (-); percentage of BF = 74·8 log10(BMI) ? 70·3 (SEE = 3·9 %, r 2 0·72, n 90) for Maori women (—); percentage of BF = 65·2 log10(BMI) ? 57·8 (SEE = 4·1 %, r 2 0·65, n 97) for Pacific Island women (·····); percentage of BF = 71·0 log10(BMI) ? 57·7 (SEE = 4·4 %, r 2 0·60, n 107) for Asian Indian women (-·-·).
